<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blizzard/Vivendi Countersue WowGlider &#8216;bot Creator</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.daledietrich.com/gaming/blizzardvivendi-countersue-wowglider-bot-creator/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.daledietrich.com/gaming/blizzardvivendi-countersue-wowglider-bot-creator/</link>
	<description>By: Dale Dietrich</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:12:17 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://www.daledietrich.com/gaming/blizzardvivendi-countersue-wowglider-bot-creator/comment-page-1/#comment-14035</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 15:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daledietrich.com/gaming/2007/02/16/blizzardvivendi-countersue-wowglider-bot-creator/#comment-14035</guid>
		<description>If Blizzard wins this suit it is a confirmation that they delivered a substandard product to its customers. And im wondering if they themselves are in breach of contract? They signed a contract with each and everyone of its customers prohibiting the use of third-party software in game. And they are stating that they encounter &quot;great harm in the direct loss of revenue from terminated users, the loss of subscription revenue from WoWGlider users availing themselves to the cheat, and from the severe damage to the goodwill of the non-cheating population of WoW users&quot;. And it is my understanding that they are trying to get monetary damages payment back from MDY. My challenge is that Blizzard should feed that potential revenue partly back to its customer base if they win - as discounts or &quot;money back&quot; offers. After all - I dont care what MDY did - what I care about is what Blizzard did and what we agreed upon when we both signed their Terms of Use Agreement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Blizzard wins this suit it is a confirmation that they delivered a substandard product to its customers. And im wondering if they themselves are in breach of contract? They signed a contract with each and everyone of its customers prohibiting the use of third-party software in game. And they are stating that they encounter &#8220;great harm in the direct loss of revenue from terminated users, the loss of subscription revenue from WoWGlider users availing themselves to the cheat, and from the severe damage to the goodwill of the non-cheating population of WoW users&#8221;. And it is my understanding that they are trying to get monetary damages payment back from MDY. My challenge is that Blizzard should feed that potential revenue partly back to its customer base if they win &#8211; as discounts or &#8220;money back&#8221; offers. After all &#8211; I dont care what MDY did &#8211; what I care about is what Blizzard did and what we agreed upon when we both signed their Terms of Use Agreement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Innovationpartners &#187; In Virtua Casem</title>
		<link>http://www.daledietrich.com/gaming/blizzardvivendi-countersue-wowglider-bot-creator/comment-page-1/#comment-11462</link>
		<dc:creator>Innovationpartners &#187; In Virtua Casem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 16:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daledietrich.com/gaming/2007/02/16/blizzardvivendi-countersue-wowglider-bot-creator/#comment-11462</guid>
		<description>[...] case on a related subject is Blizzard vs Michael Donnelly. Bilzzard is not satisfied with the fact that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] case on a related subject is Blizzard vs Michael Donnelly. Bilzzard is not satisfied with the fact that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
