Preliminary Injunction Granted Against Louisiana Violent Game Bill
Categories: Injunctions • Violent Game Law Cases
Text of Preliminary Injunction
Text of Temporary Restraining Order
Text of ESA Complaint
Text of Violent Game Bill (HB 1381)
No surprise here yet again. Jack Thompson’s violent game bill, criminalizing sales of violent video games to minors, designed to be immune from constitutional challenge - isn’t. Here are a few choice excerpts from Federal District Court Judge James Brady’s decision:
“The State’s argument overlooks a line of cases holding that video games are protected free speech…”
“Defendants (Louisiana) contend that the legislative record contains social science evidence demonstrating that violent video games are harmful. It appears that much of the same evidence has been considered by numerous courts and in each case the connection was found to be tenuous and speculative…”
“The evidence that was submitted to the legislature in connection with the bill that became the statute is sparse and could hardly be called in any sense reliable…”
“Absent an injunction the statute will have a chilling effect on both video game developers and retailers.”.
Sources: GamePolitics.com | Gamasutra | GameDaily.biz | ZDNet | ars technica | Next Generation | Joystiq | MSNBC | CBS (AP)
GamePolitics Full Coverage of Louisiana Violent Game Law
![[Home]](/graphics/button-home.gif)
![[About Me]](/graphics/button-about_me.gif)
![[The Daleisphere]](/graphics/button-the-daleisphere.gif)
![[Video Game Law]](/graphics/button-vgl.gif)
![[iMedia Law]](/graphics/button-imedia_law.gif)
![[wishhh.com]](/graphics/button_wishhh.gif)
Del.icio.us 